Just some years ago, searching for case precedent was a difficult and time consuming process, necessitating individuals to search through print copies of case regulation, or to pay for access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case legislation search prospects, and several sources offer free access to case legislation.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, it is also a perfectly-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, advertising a more informed and just society.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed inside the bank and given that only the appellants were posted with the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons having their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to complete absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
only to the ground of miscases remanded & only to the ground of misreading of evidence only on the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more
Section 302 with the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject to the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may possibly seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
The scrupulous reader might have noticed some thing earlier mentioned: a flaw. Beyond the first seven words, the definition focuses within the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The 2 basic elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of a crime are “
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved click here Unless of course case is tried using(Bail Matters)
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to your healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are no specific provisions inside the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental legislation in Pakistan, it can be important that the case founded the application from the precautionary principle where there is usually a risk to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations of your State in protecting the right to some clean and healthy environment.
To receive notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia plus the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become out there, please enter your contact information beneath.